"This analysis shows that Democrats did better in counties where they lost registration than in counties where they gained registration. I have to wonder why Democratic vote counts would consistently run contrary to changes in registration. Or, to put it more bluntly, does the Florida vote count pass the smell test?" 

 



Comparison of Democratic and Republican Populations and Vote Counts in Florida from 2000 to 2004 
Posted December 7, 2004 thepeoplesvoice.org  E-mail this page link

By: Robert Millman

(Source data - Florida Board of Elections as of 12/3/04)

Methodology

The following chart tracks changes in registration and vote counts in Florida between the presidential elections of 2000 and 2004. Its purpose is to show in broad strokes the shifts in the registration and vote counts between the two major parties and to compare the registration shifts to the vote shifts--it does not measure vote counts or vote majorities. 

To show these changes, I calculated the ratio of Republicans to Democrats both in registration and voting, and then compared the ratio in 2000 to that in 2004. In calculating the registration and the vote columns, the raw numbers are reduced to an equivalent fraction of “X” over “100”. Only Republican and Democratic voter numbers were used—smaller parties and registered but undeclared voters were not included; neither were voters for third-party candidates.



Sample, using Broward County voter registration in 2000 (equation)

Republican 

 266,829 

 = 

 X 

Democrat

 456,789 

100

 

 =  58.4  =  X


Broward County is rounded to 58
(58 Republicans for every 100 Democrats)

Example

County

2000 
Registration

Broward 58

 


All numbers entered in the Registration columns are a ratio of registered Republicans per 100 registered Democrats
All numbers entered in Vote columns are a ratio of Republican votes per 100 Democratic votes

Gain/Loss shows the difference between 2000 and 2004 in registration and vote ratios. It is a measure of increase or decrease county by county. When the 2000 number is subtracted from the 2004 number, a positive number shows an increase in the Republican registration or vote, a negative number shows an increase in the Democratic registration or vote.


Group 1: 15 Florida Counties Showing Loss in Republican Registration Percentages and Concurrent Changes in Voting 2000 to 2004 
(calculated ratio of Republican to Democrat)

County 

2000 Registration

2004 Registration

Registration Gain/Loss

2000 Vote 

2004 Vote

Vote Gain/Loss

Broward 58 53 -5 (Rep; Dem gain +5) 46 54 +8 (Rep)
Charlotte 143 141 -2 (Rep; Dem gain +2) 120 130 +10 (Rep)
Collier 240 218 -22 (Rep; Dem gain +22) 202 191 -11 (Rep; Dem gain +11) 
Indian River 173 171 -2 (Rep; Dem gain +2) 145 154 +9 (Rep)
Martin 207 191 -16 (Rep; Dem gain +16) 128 137 +9 (Rep)
Miami-Dade 85 81 -4 (Rep; Dem gain +4) 88 88 0
Palm Beach 78 71 -7 (Rep; Dem gain +7) 57 63 +6 (Rep)
Pinellas 113 104 -9 (Rep; Dem gain +9) 92 100 +8 (Rep)
Sarasota 170 154 -16 (Rep; Dem gain +16) 114 118 +4 (Rep)
Hernando 107 106 -1 (Rep; Dem gain +1) 94 115 +21 (Rep)
Manatee 136 134 -2 (Rep; Dem gain +2) 117 133 +16 (Rep)
Orange 98 87 -11 (Rep; Dem gain +11) 96 100 +4 (Rep)
Osceola 85 82 -2 (Rep; Dem gain +2) 93 112 +19 (Rep)
Seminole 146 138 -8 (Rep; Dem gain +8) 128 141 +13 (Rep)
St. Lucie 94 88 -6 (Rep; Dem gain +6) 84 92 +8 (Rep)



Group 2: 50 Florida Counties Showing Gain in Republican Registration Percentages and Concurrent Changes in Voting 2000 to 2004 
(calculated ratio of Republican to Democrat)

County 2000 Registration 2004 Registration Registration Gain/Loss 2000 Vote  2004 Vote Vote Gain/Loss
Lee 156 160 +4 (Rep) 144 148 +4 (Rep) 
Nassau 83 133 +50 (Rep) 236 277 +41 (Rep)
Pasco 101 108 +7 (Rep) 99 122 +23 (Rep)
Sumter 80 107 +27 (Rep) 126 171 +45 (Rep)
Alachua 54 55 +1 (Rep) 72 76 +4 (Rep)
Baker 16 35 +19 (Rep) 235 354 +119 (Rep)
Bay 78 113 +35 (Rep) 205 253 +48 (Rep)
Bradford 29 46 +17 (Rep) 176 233 +57 (Rep)
Brevard 122 123 +1 (Rep) 118 233 +115 (Rep)
Calhoun 10 14 +4 (Rep) 133 179 +46 (Rep)
Citrus 98 107 +9 (Rep) 117 135 +18 (Rep)
Clay 197 221 +24 (Rep) 202 327 +125 (Rep)
Columbia 41 55 +14 (Rep) 156 209 +53 (Rep)
Desoto 37 43 +6 (Rep) 128 141 +13 (Rep)
Dixie 12 19 +7 (Rep) 148 226 +78 Rep)
Duval 72 80 +8 (Rep) 141 139 -2 (Rep; Dem gain +2) 
Escambria 89 108 +19 (Rep) 178 194 +16 (Rep)
Flagler 102 105 +5 (Rep) 91 106 +15 (Rep)
Franklin 17 21 +4 (Rep) 120 145 +25 (Rep)
Gadsden 12 14 +2 (Rep) 49 43 -6 (Rep; Dem gain +6)
Gilchrist 28 52 +24 (Rep) 173 245 +72 (Rep)
Glades 30 38 +8 (Rep) 128 138 +10 (Rep)
Gulf 21 19 +19 (Rep) 148 200 +52 (Rep)
Hamilton 12 19 +7 (Rep) 125 124 -1 (Rep; Dem gain +1)
Hardee 30 42 +12 (Rep) 161 235 +74 (Rep)
Hendry 44 54 +10 (Rep) 147 145 -2 (Rep; Dem gain +2)
Highlands 106 112 +6 (Rep) 143 157 +14 (Rep)
Holmes 15 29 +14 (Rep) 230 354 +124 (Rep)
Jackson 21 31 +10 (Rep) 133 161 +28 (Rep)
Jefferson 19 29 +10 (Rep) 81 80 -1 (Rep; Dem gain +1)
Lafayette 9 16 +7 (Rep) 212 291 +79 (Rep)
Leon 46 47 +1 (Rep) 64 60 -4 (Rep; Dem gain +4)
Levy 36 46 +10 (Rep) 127 171 +44 (Rep)
Liberty 5 9 +4 (Rep) 129 180 +51 (Rep)
Madison 15 19 +4 (Rep) 101 104 +3 (Rep)
Marion 102 108 +7 (Rep) 123 142 +19 (Rep)
Monroe 100 107 +7 (Rep) 97 99 +3 (Rep)
Okaloosa 201 232 +31 (Rep) 307 360 +53 (Rep)
Okeechobee 41 51 +10 (Rep) 10 125 +25 (Rep)
Polk 84 92 +8 (Rep) 120 144 +24 (Rep)
Putnam 41 49 +8 (Rep) 111 148 +37 (Rep)
Santa Rosa 151 199 +48 (Rep) 283 355 +72 (Rep)
St. Johns 149 188 +39 (Rep) 203 224 +21 (Rep)
Suwanee 31 42 +11 (Rep) 196 247 +51 (Rep)
Taylor 17 25 +8 (Rep) 153 180 +27 (Rep)
Union 13 24 +11 (Rep) 166 271 +118 (Rep)
Walton 67 136 +69 (Rep) 216 282 +66 (Rep)



Group 3: 2 Florida Counties No Gain or Loss in Registration Percentages; Concurrent Voting
2000-2004

(calculated ratio of Republican to Democrat)

County 2000 Registration 2004 Registration Registration Gain/Loss 2000 Vote 2004 Vote Vote Gain/Loss
Lake 138 138 0 137 154 +17 (Rep)
Volusia 88 88 0 85 138 +53 (Rep)



Commentary

I first analyzed the Florida election using the vote counts posted at http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm, and I was surprised by the pattern that emerged. Since then, the Florida Board of Elections has posted its official counts for the 2004 general election http://election.dos.state.fl.us/, and I recalculated the results, using the Florida BOE numbers. I was even more surprised by the pattern that emerged: Of the 15 Florida counties where Democratic registration increased, 13 counties lost Democratic vote share compared with 2000, one remained unchanged in proportion and in the one county where vote share improved for the Democratic candidate the vote gain was half of the registration gain.

I have heard the explanation that Republicans simply out-worked the Democrats in Florida, which is why Republicans did so well. But vote variations seem disproportionate to registration variations if you compare Group 1 and Group 2. Democrats’ vote share increased better than registration only in 6 counties where Democrats lost registration (Republicans gained); and out of the 15 counties where Democrats increased registration, they lost vote share in all but one. (And, in that one county, the Democrats picked up 22 points in registration, but picked up only 11 points in the vote.) 

This simple analysis shows that Democrats did better than registration shifts only in counties where they lost registration. I have to wonder why Democratic vote counts would run contrary to changes in registration in one group but not in another. Or, to put it more bluntly, does the Florida vote count pass the smell test? If someone can tell me how this could plausibly happen, and throughout a state where more than 7 million votes were cast, I would like to know. 

I am not a statistician and my method is perhaps unorthodox, but it is a simple way to compare changes in voting and registration. I arrived at these results using a calculator and paper and pen. I encourage anyone to check the figures.

-###-


© Copyright 12/5/04 by Robert Millman 508 Lindsay Ave., Glenville, NY 12302 Permission is granted for Print in print, email, blog, or web media if this credit is attached and the information remains unchanged. r.millman@att.net