"Zionism supports the creation of a Jewish state in violation of the
teachings of Orthodox Judaism and the Torah." |
|
The Zionist Connection
AN UNHOLY TRIPARTITE
Posted May 26, 2004 thepeoplesvoice.org
By: Ted Lang
Henry Makow, a PhD. who writes for several Internet news and opinion
websites, has provided invaluable insight focusing on political alliances
that control the United States as well as the entire world. An unholy
tripartite threatens the individual freedom of all people, as well as the
peace of the entire world, desiring the establishment of a New World Order
controlled by one global government. It consists of these three entities:
Zionism, communism and the international banking cartel. And as regards
this unholy trio's control of all politics, remember FDR's observation that
nothing in politics happens without being planned.
Zionism supports the creation of a Jewish state in violation of the
teachings of Orthodox Judaism and the Torah. Of course, there are patriotic
American Jews, as well as Christians, who support and are sympathetic to the
state of Israel, but not to the extent of putting such political sympathies
on a level higher than their patriotism and loyalty to the United States.
And increasingly, radical Zionism is growing in aggressiveness and
deadliness. And should anyone marry these three entities as a collaborative
effort or conspiracy, they will be branded as being anti-Semitic. And that
is precisely the purpose of the term.
But Zionism has partially achieved its ultimate goal, the modern state of
Israel, via secretive plotting and heavy funding by the Jewish [Zionist]
Rothschild international banking family, most prominently embodied in the
Bank of England. It is loosely and unofficially estimated that the
Rothschilds control almost three fifths the world's wealth of about $500
trillion in fiat money through the indebtedness of world governments, while
about another $100 trillion of the world's wealth is controlled by the
Rockefellers. Another 11 rich and powerful banking families, as well as
wealthy individuals, families and governments, control the remaining $100
trillion of the world's wealth.
Makow has taken much pain and written extensively on the relationship
between the Rothschild-led 13 member banking cartel, and the close
relationship Baron Lionel Walter Rothschild maintained with both Lenin and
Trotsky when they all were alive and plotting together. And Trotsky has
been connected to Leo Strauss and the neo-conservative, Zionist cabal
identified as the Project for the New American Century, or PNAC. And just
like FDR's Zionist cabal of the 1930s and 1940s, consisting then of Justice
Felix Frankfurter, Bernard M. Baruch, Henry Morgenthau, Benjamin Cohen, and
Samuel Rosenman, President George W. Bush's present Zionist cabal consists
of David Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearl, Bill Kristol and others.
They represent a carbon copy of the continuing Zionist organized
manipulation of our government to achieve a world control agenda originating
with the communist-oriented, Zionist international banking cartel.
During World War II, America's involvement protecting Britain and joining it
and the Soviet Union to engage in war against Axis Germany, Japan and Italy,
served to make the world safe from National Socialism [Nazism] thereby
advancing the "Jewish intellectualism" that is communism. And as Woodrow
Wilson was advised by yet another Zionist cabal back during World War I,
consisting of a different Jewish Justice, Louis D. Brandeis, and the same
Bernard M. Baruch and Henry Morgenthau that served in FDR's cabal, America
was drawn into the "War to End All Wars" to make the world "safe for
democracy," thereby advancing the cause and ensuring the resultant success
of National Socialism.
Although modern communism, as well as all things bad, with the exception of
the Christmas tree and Sauerbraten und Kartoffelnkloss originated in
Germany, to include militarism, our failing government-controlled school
system, our failing Social Security system and National Socialism, the
communist movement shifted from Germany to Russia during the latter of the
nineteenth and early part of the twentieth century. The Rothschild-led
banking cartel saw the possibilities in a large, heavily industrialized
nation like Russia, where the all-encompassing socialism that is communism
could take root. Of course, the United States would have been a much better
prize for communism, but lacked the level of poverty and despair of the
Russian masses that was more pronounced thereby more enabling of violent
revolution or Bolshevism.
Czar Nicholas II of Russia made serious and devastating mistakes as regards
the Russo-Japanese War of 1905, in which the entire powerful Russian fleet
and Port Arthur were lost. His miscalculation of the powerful Japanese, as
well as Russia's loss of the war, helped to incite the Russian populace even
more when faced with rapidly deteriorating economic conditions in spite of
the great potential of Russian industry. The Zionist Rothschild banking
cartel had heavily financed the Japanese, as their target for revolution was
Russia.
Strikes and labor unrest morphed into communist-led labor rebellions against
the Christian monarchy of Czar Nicholas II, who blamed the Jews and their
communist intellectualism and labor unions. It was Nicholas II who probably
first recognized the connection between Judaism and communism. Nicholas
persecuted the Jews with a series of pogroms and acts of terror, causing
many Jews to flee the country. Their new country of choice, for the most
part, was Germany, and Germany basically welcomed them. It must be
stressed, that not all Jews fit the generalized indictment that has caused
the persecution and suffering of all Jews, a fact that presents itself so
glaringly during Hitler's persecution of Jewish populations with the help of
the Zionist Jews.
Of course, Jewish intellectualism and capitalism created an astounding
mutual benefit, and many Jewish capitalists became extremely wealthy. Among
these were the Jewish bankers that became unmistakingly intertwined with the
Rothschild international banking cartel, and therefore, became part and
parcel of the Rothschild plan for world domination.
The Rothschild-affiliated Bleichroder Bank of Berlin, specifically mentioned
in Article 263 of the Versailles Treaty, was heavily involved with Germany's
war reparations, as were the Warburgs, the Hamburg bankers, and German
Jewish industrialist Walter Rathenau. Max Warburg headed the M.M. Warburg
Bank and was head of German finances, and his brother Paul represented
President Woodrow Wilson's newly created United States Federal Reserve Bank.
An interesting aside in all this, can be found on the website of Michael
Haupt: Three World Wars.com. Quoting from his section on the horrific
Versailles Treaty, he offers:
One of the planks of the Treaty called for large amounts of war reparations
to be paid to the victorious nations by the German government. This plank
of the Treaty alone caused more grief in the German nation than any other and precipitated three events:
1. The "hyperinflation" of the German mark between 1920 and 1923;
2. The destruction of the middle class in Germany; and
3. The bringing to power of someone who could end the inflation: a dictator
like Adolf Hitler.
This plank was written by John Foster Dulles, one of the founders of the
Council on Foreign Relations, and later the Secretary of State to President Dwight Eisenhower.
At this point, it serves of little value to explore the precise reasons for
the start of World War I. My high school history classes spoke of clashes
for "spheres of influence" as there was heavy competition for the
colonization of Third World nations for their territories and natural
resources. But the international banking cartel, as evidenced by their
financial support of Japan, serves as another stronger possibility. What is
of course important is that the international banking cartel always profits
greatly from war. Undoubtedly, their intrigue played a hefty hand in
igniting the hostilities. And their horrific management at Versailles in
"cashing in" on the sufferings of the war didn't go unnoticed by the
Germans. Nor did the Germans fail to notice the "Jewishness" of these
bankers.
Yet, in spite of the glaring and emerging truths and facts that attend real
history, a real bias has been substituted to purposely cloud these issues,
issues from which we could learn so much to affect a true understanding of
the lessons that could be learned from them; if we could only remove that
bias. Well before our involvement militarily in World War I, private sector
activities that went deliberately unnoticed by the Woodrow Wilson
administration included the contracts ".for millions of artillery shells, as
well as ten 500-ton submarines. Though the construction of such foreign
vessels broke the law, Bethlehem [Steel] proceeded with it and the Wilson
administration did not stop them. The company earned $61 million in 1916,
more than its combined gross revenues for the previous eight years." ["The
United States and World War I," by John J. Dwyer, January 26, 2004,
LewRockwell.com]
Governments require huge sources of funds to manufacture the tools, weapons
and machines of destruction for war, and therefore go deeply into debt. And
that's where the financing international bankers come in. They enjoy huge
profits by funding warring nations, sometimes both sides of the same
conflict, thereby ensuring the profits that can be earned from debt
generation and the profitable interest thereto appertaining. The taxpayers
of the warring nations foot the bill for decades, incurring huge sums of
national debt, and enriching the bankers.
The events and agendas surrounding World War I have created ALL the
conditions we as a people and a nation face today. And these conditions are
still being controlled by the unholy tripartite of Zionism, communism and
international banking. Germany won World War I. The war was over, but
prior to an acceptance of Germany's offer of a simple status quo ante end to
the war with no punitive, attendant conditions for the losers, namely Great
Britain and France, the international banking community, through its Zionist
representatives, approached the British, desperate to win the war, and
offered Britain a deal.
The deal entailed that if the Zionist-led international banking cartel could
arrange Britain's victory, would Great Britain support a Zionist state later
on when the right conditions presented themselves? Great Britain agreed to
these terms, and as their part of the deal, the Zionist bankers would get
the United States of America into the conflict and reverse the obvious
outcome.
This explanation is verified by subsequent international events, none the
least of which was the outbreak of World War II, which was directly caused
by the "terms and conditions" of the settlement of World War I; namely, the
Versailles Treaty and the Balfour Declaration. But examine the biased
evaluation offered by William L. Shirer, author of The Rise and Fall of the
Third Reich: "One gets the impression that a good many of these 'good
Germans' fell too easily into the trap of blaming the outside world for
their own failures, as some of them had done for Germany's misfortunes after
the first lost war and even for the advent of Hitler himself." In another
section of his book, Shirer offers the phoniness of German outrage as
regards the rape of their nation, writing, "To overthrow them [the Nazi
hierarchy] now might merely perpetuate another 'stab-in-the-back' legend,
such as that which had fooled so many Germans after the First World War."
Astonishing! The rape of Germany was a "legend." The German people were
merely "fooled?" Nonsense! This failure to accept the consequences of the
rape of Germany via the Versailles Treaty and the Balfour Declaration
foolishly ignores the actual causes for the rise of Hitler, the Nazis, and
the underlying causes of World War II.
One of the driving forces that ensured involvement by the United States in
WW I was none other than Winston Churchill, who became First Lord of the
Admiralty in 1911. About a year later, the British luxury steamship,
Titanic, sank off the coast of Newfoundland after an iceberg ripped a long,
gaping hole along the ship's hull, breaching past many of the bulkhead
sections of the ship. The incoming waters could not be contained, and the
huge steamer sank, taking with it 1,500 souls. It was a horrific sea
disaster, but not one lost in terms of its usefulness to Churchill and his
British Admiralty.
When Britain, France and Europe became embroiled in WW I in 1914, one year
later another great British steamship went down, but this was a very planned
and deliberate action. Churchill wanted the United States to join Britain
and France in the war against the "evil" Kaiser Wilhelm, and curiously, in
1915, one year after the guns of August began their deadly fusillades, a
German submarine sank the Lusitania, which was loaded with munitions and
explosives.
Prior to its sinking, Churchill threatened the German u-boat patrols, and
advised commercial ships to ram and sink them in violation of
non-belligerency agreements. Cunard Lines, owner of the Lusitania, turned
the ship over to Churchill and the Admiralty for use in transporting
munitions. The Germans took out newspaper ads in New York City to warn
Americans not to sail on British ships that intended hostilities towards
German military shipping.
In violation of the non-belligerency agreements, the Lusitania, laden with
explosives, munitions and weapons, and transporting innocent Americans
across the Atlantic to Europe, was attacked by a German sub and sunk. There
is a chance that the Germans just got lucky. But there is also a strong
possibility that German intelligence, made famous by the employment of such
famous operatives as Mata Hari, were tipped off about the huge shipment of
munitions aboard the Lusitania. The clues as to this were first made
available, of all places, on The Discovery Channel. Additionally, the
Lusitania's escort ship, the Juno, was well underway to escort the
Lusitania, but the Juno, almost in rendezvous with the Lusitania, was
ordered to return to port by Churchill and the Admiralty. The British
Admiralty deliberately made the ship vulnerable to submarine attack, an
event easily preventable. It sort of reminds one of the ease of protecting
America from the 9-11 terrorist attacks that somehow got past our government
even though evidence continues to mount that the event was known to be
imminent.
A documentary on the search for the Lusitania was presented on The Discovery
Channel a few years ago. If memory serves, it was the same search and
salvage expedition that located the Titanic. There are two clues as to the
ill-fated ship's sinking by the Germans. First, the expedition searched the
ocean floor thoroughly, relying upon coordinates supplied by the records of
the British Admiralty. Secondly, the headlines of The New York Times
indicated that the Lusitania had been sunk by two torpedoes. How could the
Times know this, unless that information came directly from the British
Admiralty?
Why the importance of two torpedoes versus one? Because one torpedo couldn'
t possibly sink a ship that large. Watertight doors would have sealed
sections of the ship between bulkheads, and the ship wouldn't have gone
down. But the single torpedo ignited all the explosives and munitions that
the Admiralty knew was aboard. And the coordinates recorded for the
Lusitania's position were therefore deliberately incorrect.
The search and salvage expedition recreated the average speed of the ship,
the effect of ocean currents and wind, and replotted the ship's course, and
estimated the position of the Lusitania independently from information
available from the British. The ship was found, and indeed, the wreck
showed that it had been struck by only one torpedo. How convenient that the
Admiralty records were so incorrect. How convenient it was for the British
and Churchill as concerns the timing of the Lusitania's sinking, which
launched in the United States an anti-German sentiment that never existed
before, and that was absolutely blown out of all proportion by the American,
Zionist-controlled press.
The Germans lost WWI. The Versailles Treaty was one of the harshest and
most savage war settlements in history. Combined with the fact that not one
shot was fired on German soil, not one drop of blood was shed upon it, no
war damage occurred on the land at all, and yet, the German nation was
literally raped by this horrific treaty. Undoubtedly, Churchill played a
major role in this, but that wasn't evident at the time. What was evident
to the Germans though, was the appearance of the German Jewish and Zionist
international bankers and their Zionist representatives, and the Germans
then knew whom to blame for their engineered defeat via the powerful support
from the United States.
Combined with the Balfour Declaration, wherein Britain's Foreign Secretary
guaranteed "Lord Rothschild" a Jewish state in the Middle East territories
wrested from the old Ottoman Turkish Empire, the seeds for the hatred of all
Jews as well as their planned annihilation were planted. It provided Hitler
with the hate and anger he exploited to enforce a "regime change" in his own
former Weimar Republic, as well as virtually all the nations in Europe. And
what the outcome of World War I failed to produce, namely the domination of
most of Europe by communism, was transferred in time to almost a quarter of
a century later, with the Judeo-Communist victory of WW II. We are seeing
an imperial and brutally expanding Jewish state, and its progress in
utilizing the military might of the United States to bring about a "New
World Order" controlled by Tel Aviv, which is merely a repeat of historic
lessons never taught, and therefore, never learned.
-###-
© THEODORE E. LANG 5/23/04 All rights reserved.
Ted Lang is a political analyst and a freelance writer.